[Bug 10879] Including "impossible" requirements even as a SHOULD is unnecessary

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10879

--- Comment #3 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2010-10-04 06:41:01 UTC ---
A realistic implementation of this requirement is to have the conformance
checker as a browser plugin/extension which checks conformance of the document
over time while the user interacts with it. (It still cannot prove that scripts
never cause non-conforming states to occur, but it can catch a non-conforming
state when it actually happens for the user.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 06:41:03 UTC