- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:53:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10919 --- Comment #2 from Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@namics.com> 2010-10-01 08:53:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > You say that some screen readers don't recognize a role=tab if it's not a > direct child of a role=tablist. You then say that role=presentation "deletes" > an element from the accessibility mapping, allowing the descendent role=tab to > act like a child of the role=tablist, thus being recognized. > > Is this latter statement what actually happens in the screenreaders previously > mentioned? Or is it a statement of what *should* happen in a good > screenreader? When an author doesn't state explicitly that an element should be removed from the accessibility API "DOM" by using role="presentation", the element and it's default role should remain intact. I'll ask the NVDA core developer how it is handled there, but the accessibility API mapping in general is done by the browser and only accessed, not modified by a screenreader. So there are screenreaders that recognize tab as a descendent of tablist even when other elements are between them, and others where tab is only recognized as an immediate child of tablist. Authors can force the latter by removing the elements in between by using role="presentation", which is in accordance with the ARIA definition when the elements are used for presentational purposes like applying shadows or background images. By the way, the W3C validator mandates that tabs need to be immediate child nodes of tablist, too. I believe this is an error as it doesn't take the power of role="presentation" into account. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 08:53:21 UTC