- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:05:49 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11402 --- Comment #8 from Kornel Lesinski <kornel@geekhood.net> 2010-11-30 22:05:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > If that's the primary use, then you can make it simpler. Just have browsers > agree on a set of standard library names to prepackage, then use something like > > <script src="scripts/jquery-1.4.2.js" library="jquery-1.4.2"></script> > > and browsers would agree on what the exact file for "jquery-1.4.2" is, bit for > bit. So basically, instead of a general-purpose sharing scheme, just develop > the notion of a standard library for JS. Libraries simply bundled with browsers would be annoying just like outdated browsers themselves — webmasters would again face choice between forgoing this feature and sticking to a buggy version that was shipped with the browser years ago. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 22:05:51 UTC