- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:11:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11427 --- Comment #7 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> 2010-11-29 17:11:12 UTC --- You need the optional but specified functionality in appendix E of the xml catalog spec (or use an sgml-open catalog: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/entity/spec-2001-08-06.html#s.doctype But I guess you knew that and discounted this in advance with the "normative" rider. > And I don't see the recalcitrance to allowing it for the XML serialization. > I'm not requesting that xml:id be the only option, or even the preferred > option. But I think that you were requesting that a valid HTML5 DOM that is serialised as xhtml should use xml:id rather than id for attributes of type ID (that is, that the name of the attribute be changed on serialisation)? xml:id is usable with any XML document type and infers IDness if used with an xml:id processor, but usually (as here) it makes the document invalid, whether that matters or not depends on what you are doing. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 17:11:15 UTC