- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:19:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9746
steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-11-28 07:19:13 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: partially accepted
Change Description: removed duplicate
Rationale: I'm marking this "Rejected" because I didn't make any change to the
spec. Please let me know if I misunderstood what you were saying.
>1) 11.1 is repeated twice.
removed duplicate.
>2) Logos.
whether or not to provide an indication of the presence of a logo is dependent
upon the context the image is being used in. In most cases the best course of
action if the presenece of the logo is to be indicated would be to provide it
with a caption. I will add an example isllustrating this to the spec.
>3) Distinguishing between illustrations and photographs.
again the best emthod to provide such image categorisation is via a caption. I
will add an example isllustrating this to the spec.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 28 November 2010 07:19:15 UTC