- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:25:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11324 Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> 2010-11-20 18:25:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Hi Mike, > nobody as yes has expressed any strong objections to that wording. I expressed a concern and made a suggestion. It was ignored. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Oct/0466.html The W3C communications staff's verbiage would alleviate that problem with the original wording. > It's not clear how that is any improvement over the text that is already in the > warning and that has already been discussed on the public-html list. That text > is this: > [[ > This is a work in progress! > > For the latest updates from the HTML WG, possibly including important bug > fixes, please look at the <a>editor's draft</a> instead. > ]] > The editor's draft isn't necessarily the "latest updates from the HTML WG". It is the latest updates from the editor. (In reply to comment #2) Hi Philippe, > IMO, the current wording doesn't reflect enough the fact that what is in the > editor does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the group, thus the mention of "experiments" in the proposed wording. I agree. W3C communications staff's verbiage is a simple and honest statement. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 20 November 2010 18:25:27 UTC