- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:20:17 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 --- Comment #84 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-11-15 21:20:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #83) > (In reply to comment #81) > > one of the ideas I have discussed with some people is having the poster > > attribute accept an ID which can be the ID of an <img> element anywhere on the > > page. In this way a new element/attribute is not required as the alt of the > > <img> will be the alt for the poster. > > It seems unlikely that the poster frame would be displayed as an image in a > separate place on the page. The whole point of the poster frame is that it is a > temporary placeholder for the video, and it goes away as soon as the video > starts playing. i guess my thinking was more that it would be in the video element, so could also serve as fallback if video was not supported. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 21:20:19 UTC