- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:15:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 --- Comment #82 from Peter Winnberg <peter.winnberg@gmail.com> 2010-11-15 20:15:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #81) > one of the ideas I have discussed with some people is having the poster > attribute accept an ID which can be the ID of an <img> element anywhere on the > page. In this way a new element/attribute is not required as the alt of the > <img> will be the alt for the poster. Using an img element does sound like a possible solution to this, but what web browsers that doesn't support the video element should they still display this img element? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 20:15:29 UTC