- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:18:42 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11211 --- Comment #17 from Aharon Lanin <aharon.lists.lanin@gmail.com> 2010-11-14 10:18:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #13) > > I recommend that we try using 
 for now, and see where that gets us. As far as I understand, LINE SEPARATOR support has been added to CSS 2.1 tests. Perhaps this will cause browsers to start supporting it. Currently they don't - it either has no effect at all or is displayed as a rectangle or something. > > Since the CSS layer doesn't yet support this, there's not much we can do right > > now. Well, theoretically the CSS layer does support it, since it does not explicitly say anything about LINE SEPARATOR, so the Unicode spec should apply, and the new tests should enforce it. > > If 
 works, then we can get the MathML WG to add a &ls; named > > Was that a typo? AFAIK MathML has nothing to do with this. Maybe XML WG? > Can't/shouldn't html add entities beyond the predefined XML set? (I do not know > - this is for my general knowledge...) Yeah, who controls named entities? Will we have to wait for HTML6 to get new ones if we don't do it now? > How about <br ubi> as suggested by Aharon in bug 10828, comment 22? There is no ubi attribute. Instead, there is a bdi element, which does not help us here. See there for discussion. > As for later comments - I'm not sure I understand the current direction: was > the intention to: (a) Add some new attribute/element and use 
 in the > specification of its required behaviour? > or: (b) Add nothing new, and have the content-authors implement the linebreak > 
 ? It's b. > If it is in the scope of HTML to *require* implementation of entities, then a > possible solution would be to require compliant application to properly handle > both U+2028 and U+2029, and to add a comment in the <br> spec, saying that > users should prefer using U+2029 (or better yet, named entity e.g. &ps;) > instead of <br> ( or using U+2028 (or named entity e.g. &ls;), for the usecase > described in this bug). It's not the entity that's the problem. It's the character itself that all current browsers don't support. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 14 November 2010 10:18:44 UTC