- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:04:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11197 Summary: Require Change Proposals in order to reintroduce a change related to a revert Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: rubys@intertwingly.net QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org We have an instance of a change made after the last call cutoff that was made without any discussion on public-html and was not made in response to any bug report. This caused people to object, and the chairs (per the Enhanced Change Control policy in effect) asked for it to be reverted, and the editor refused, not once, but twice to do so. The chairs then requested the the WG Staff make the change that the editor was unwilling to do. Again, without participating in the discussion or any bug report, the editor made another change, and this has resulted in a second round of discussions and even bug reports. At this time, the outcome of that is unclear. In any case, we are rushing to resolve an issue that is not related to getting us to last call. The proposed solution is that we require a change proposal, including rationale and a description of the proposed change, after which the chairs will seek amicable resolution. Failing that, alternate change proposals will be sought. At a minimum, this will allow us to more predictably schedule our time. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 14:04:47 UTC