- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 20:58:14 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9729 --- Comment #3 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2010-05-19 20:58:13 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > We have a venue for discussion where people can, and do, state what they are > > for and what they oppose. From that we have a process that culls out from that > > discussion concrete and actionable proposals. From that, we solicit objections > > to those proposals. At no point are people discouraged from expressing their > > opinion -- on the proper venue. > > but > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010May/0344.html > > says > > > I encourage more of it, though the normal caveats apply: I would prefer > > that we avoid repetition and "me too"'s, and would prefer to keep meta > > discussion to a minimum, in separate threads, and ideally off list. > > So what is the proper venue for expressing "me too"'s, i.e., agreement with a > previously expressed opinion? > > (more replies to other points to come) A wiki page would be a fine place to capture "me too"'s. At the present time, I don't see any point in the process where I would take that into consideration, but if others view this information as *essential*, then they are welcome to organize and pursue it. Brief and infrequent mentions and summaries on public-html would be fine. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 20:58:16 UTC