- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:18:55 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8321 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi --- Comment #10 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2010-03-31 08:18:54 --- (In reply to comment #9) > • The XHTML1.1. spec itself purports to be a XHTML 1.1. document - but is > served as 'text/html' > Since for ever? It appears it has been that way since before XHTML 1.1 first edition transitioned to REC, which means XHTML 1.1 PR would have been in violation of Pubrules as Pubrules exist today. (I didn't check if Pubrules were different on this point at the time of XHTML 1.1 1st ed. PR publication.) It seems to me that there's been quite a bit of selective attention paid to the W3C rules in the sense that the (current) HTML WG gets much more Process scrutiny than the XHTML2 WG. It seems weird that the media type change controller issue gets this much scrutiny in the context of the HTML WG while the XHTML2 WG publishes rules about text/html in a Note that isn't subject to the reviews provided by the W3C Process. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 08:18:57 UTC