- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:50:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9287
Summary: DOCTYPE "mostly useless"
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#the-doctype
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 spec bugs
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: tj@crowdersoftware.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
In Section 8.1.1[1], the current published specification says:
> A DOCTYPE is a mostly useless, but required, header.
It then goes on to say:
> DOCTYPEs are required for legacy reasons. When omitted, browsers tend to use a different rendering mode that is incompatible with some specifications.
So, not useless then, or even mostly useless, as it's required to ensure that
the most common UAs in the world (web browsers) behave something close to
properly.
Perhaps consider dropping the "mostly useless" comment to avoid encouraging
skimmers to drop it. Perhaps "A DOCTYPE is a required header that primarily
serves a legacy, but significant, purpose."
(Separately: It's a header? That seems an odd term for it.)
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#the-doctype
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 13:50:30 UTC