- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:13:49 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9270
Summary: I think this specification is a big step backwards. I
don't know if it technically qualifies as “tag
soup”, but it sure feels like it. Semantically, a
<dl> makes more sense, and moreover I think the <dialog>
element (removed during current ongoing
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-
work/#conversations
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec bugs
AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#conversations
Comment:
I think this specification is a big step backwards. I don't know if it
technically qualifies as “tag soup”, but it sure feels like it.
Semantically, a <dl> makes more sense, and moreover I think the <dialog>
element (removed during current ongoing HTML5 work) was an EXCELLENT element
that solves a very common use case. If HTML5 attempts to formalize
already-common practices on the Web, it should provide a <dialog> element.
Marking up a conversation as defined in the specification—at least, the one
I’m commenting on right now…I hope the version is preserved—it seems
contradictory to resort to a group of mixed generic <p>s, <time>s, and <b>s
when the spec has gone out of its way to formalize other widespread
conventions like <article>. PLEASE, bring back <dialog>!
Posted from: 129.2.139.195
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 15:13:51 UTC