- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:59:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8895
Larry Masinter <lmm@acm.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lmm@acm.org
--- Comment #2 from Larry Masinter <lmm@acm.org> 2010-03-03 15:59:16 ---
All of the special HTML-WG-only processes should be described in a single
document; if there are separate sections for the decision policy for working
group comments, accepting an editor's draft (three submitters?), publishing
documents as FPWD after split (?) , and responding to other working groups,
that's fine, but having them together so that participants can actually
understand what the actual practices are would seem to be a fundamental
requirement for "transparency": that everyone who might engage in a process (or
even just be called on to review the results of a process) actually knows what
the rules are and have been -- not just those who have been following for
years.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 15:59:18 UTC