- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:13:48 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10033 Summary: Document fails to capture fundamental difference between html4 and 5 Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van Kesteren) AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com >>>>> HTML4 became a W3C Recommendation in 1997. While it continues to serve >>>>> as a rough guide to many of the core features of HTML, it does not >>>>> provide enough information to build implementations that interoperate >>>>> with each other and, more importantly, with a critical mass of >>>>> deployed content. >>>> >>>> This may be generally accepted by some members of the community, yet >>>> it does not let outsiders know what what actually wrong with the way >>>> HTML4 was specified. This is really important, because it underpins >>>> why HTML5 is such a large spec and why it covers so much stuff. Can >>>> you please clearly list the deficiencies which HTML4 has and how HTML5 >>>> has attempted to overcome those (i.e., what processes are actually in >>>> place to avoid the mistakes of HTML4 being remade in HTML5). >>> >>> I don't think that's of relevance to this document, but it would >>> certainly be interesting to have such a document. The audience of such a >>> document would not be authors though, I would think. >> >> I don't see how this cannot be relevant to this document. This, in >> fact, _is_ the whole point of this document. That is at the core of >> the fundamental difference between HTML4 and HTML5. I would again >> request that the document clearly list the deficiencies which HTML4 >> has and how HTML5 has attempted to overcome those. > > It is not at all the whole point of this document. The point is to point > out what is new and has changed compared to HTML4, because authors know > HTML4. Explaining how HTML4 was completely inadequate is interesting > research and might be of use to people writing specifications, but for > everyone else it is moot as we have HTML5 now. I respectfully disagree. I call on the WG to make a formal decision about this matter. I would also add that writers of specification are also authors of HTML, such as you and I. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:13:52 UTC