- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:11:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10032 Summary: Parts of document read like personal observation. Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van Kesteren) AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com >>>>> In some >>>>> respects, implementations and author practices have converged with >>>>> each other and with specifications and standards, but in other ways, >>>>> they continue to diverge. >>>> >>>> The above is weak on it's own (it reads like a personal observation). >>>> Can you expand on it and give concrete examples. >>> >>> I don't think that's of relevance to this document. It's really just an >>> introduction, not a definitive reference. >> >> As way of introduction, the above assertion basically frames the >> rationale for the document. Without concrete examples, it just sounds >> like rhetorical grandstanding. > > It just illustrates things are complex. It fails to illustrate that: it reads like rhetorical grandstanding. To illustrate that things were complex, your would need some concrete examples or data. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:11:30 UTC