- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:11:28 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10032
Summary: Parts of document read like personal observation.
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van
Kesteren)
AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com
ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com
>>>>> In some
>>>>> respects, implementations and author practices have converged with
>>>>> each other and with specifications and standards, but in other ways,
>>>>> they continue to diverge.
>>>>
>>>> The above is weak on it's own (it reads like a personal observation).
>>>> Can you expand on it and give concrete examples.
>>>
>>> I don't think that's of relevance to this document. It's really just an
>>> introduction, not a definitive reference.
>>
>> As way of introduction, the above assertion basically frames the
>> rationale for the document. Without concrete examples, it just sounds
>> like rhetorical grandstanding.
>
> It just illustrates things are complex.
It fails to illustrate that: it reads like rhetorical grandstanding. To
illustrate that things were complex, your would need some concrete
examples or data.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:11:30 UTC