- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:39:55 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8379 --- Comment #7 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-01-08 18:39:55 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Shelley, that's a violation of the process. The bug was reopened, meaning the > next step in the process is 5.c, not 5.d. > > Before we escalate this to a working group issue, I would like to request that > you (Shelley and Bruce) see if you can come to some sort of compromise. Is > there some solution that wouldsatisfy you both? For example, Bruce, is it > critical for you that <details> be in this version of HTML, or would you be ok > with it being in the next version of HTML (with <device>)? > Whatever you do, do not specify a solution as "can it be in the next version of HTML". I will never agree to something like that. Sorry, but I think that is the worst approach we can take. I filed the original bug to remove the section. I'm not going to change my mind, and I feel my arguments were valid. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 18:39:57 UTC