- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:50:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9081
steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-02-24 10:50:54 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The fourth "The Lady of Shalott" example would read as follows to a
> non-graphical user:
> *** Medieval Nights ***
> Painting of a woman in a white flowing dress, sitting in a small boat.
> Join us for our medieval theme nights every Friday at
> Boaters Bar,on the riverside, Kingston upon Thames.
> This would be very confusing to say the least. The image is purely decorative;
> the alt="" text should be empty.
the presence of an image is indicated to users of screen readers such as JAWS
or NVDA
> *** Medieval Nights ***
> image: Painting of a woman in a white flowing dress, sitting in a small boat.
> Join us for our medieval theme nights every Friday at
> Boaters Bar,on the riverside, Kingston upon Thames.
So it would not be confusing at all. A majority (70%) of screen reader users in
a recent survey indictaed their preference to have an image described "If an
image is used solely to enhance the mood or feel of a web page."
While I myself would reccommend that such images have an empty alt, I cannot
say that if an author does provide such alt text that it would be
non-conforming in HTML5. What I will do though is provide more examples of such
content and in what cases it would recommened that alt=""
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 10:50:57 UTC