- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:50:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9081 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-02-24 10:50:54 --- (In reply to comment #0) > The fourth "The Lady of Shalott" example would read as follows to a > non-graphical user: > *** Medieval Nights *** > Painting of a woman in a white flowing dress, sitting in a small boat. > Join us for our medieval theme nights every Friday at > Boaters Bar,on the riverside, Kingston upon Thames. > This would be very confusing to say the least. The image is purely decorative; > the alt="" text should be empty. the presence of an image is indicated to users of screen readers such as JAWS or NVDA > *** Medieval Nights *** > image: Painting of a woman in a white flowing dress, sitting in a small boat. > Join us for our medieval theme nights every Friday at > Boaters Bar,on the riverside, Kingston upon Thames. So it would not be confusing at all. A majority (70%) of screen reader users in a recent survey indictaed their preference to have an image described "If an image is used solely to enhance the mood or feel of a web page." While I myself would reccommend that such images have an empty alt, I cannot say that if an author does provide such alt text that it would be non-conforming in HTML5. What I will do though is provide more examples of such content and in what cases it would recommened that alt="" -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 10:50:57 UTC