W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 9040] "Wherever a subdocument fragment is allowed in a compound document" -- What's an example of this?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:35:42 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Njs7C-0007uI-4J@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9040


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-02-23 10:35:41 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: I don't know of an example of this currently. It's intended for use
by specifications in the future that wish to allow for other document types to
be embedded in their vocabularies.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 10:35:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC