- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:58:17 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8600 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-02-17 23:58:17 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: This seems like something for the CSS spec. We could say something about the <header> and <footer> elements becoming headers and footers, but that would just open a can of worms of questions so long that we'd be updating that section for months until finally just removing it and pointing to CSS. So I think we're better off just pointing to CSS. (Questions would include such things as "what happens when the header is big", "what if the header contains a plugin", "what if the header is position:fixed", etc.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 23:58:18 UTC