W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 8948] text/richtext is obsolete; it is inappropriate as an example

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:09:39 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Nhgqh-0005do-JZ@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8948


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-02-17 10:09:39 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: changed types to vnd types
Rationale: I don't mind what types we use here. Maybe vendor types are actually
better examples.

BTW, it's not obsolete according to IANA.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 10:09:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC