W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 9010] There are one or more alternate methods of adding data without using RDFa, such as [microdata].

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:00:18 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NhYH4-00058s-Qk@wiggum.w3.org>

--- Comment #7 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  2010-02-17 01:00:18 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I was expecting that Larry would use this bug and escalate it in some way to
> become a full fledged HTML WG issue per the HTML WG bug/issue escalation
> process.
> Marking it as RESOLVED INVALID or CLOSED is going to ensure that it doesn't
> show up in the next SotD section for the HTML+RDFa draft. Larry, are you sure
> you want me to Mark this bug as CLOSED?

If it's RESOLVED, it can be escalated to an issue if anyone (including either
Larry or you) chooses. Does HTML+RDFa not have a way to add markers based on
the issue tracker?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 01:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC