W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 9012] New: There is concern that continued development of HTML+RDFa belongs in a different working group.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:13:49 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-9012-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9012

           Summary: There is concern that continued development of HTML+RDFa
                    belongs in a different working group.
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: ASSIGNED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny)
        AssignedTo: msporny@digitalbazaar.com
        ReportedBy: msporny@digitalbazaar.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org,
                    msporny@digitalbazaar.com


There is concern that continued development of the HTML+RDFa specification
belongs in a different working group. For example, the HTML WG could find that
RDFa is in-scope for HTML WG, but delegate authoring of the specification to
the RDFa WG. HTML WG could review and comment publicly before RDFa 1.1 and
HTML+RDFa reaches REC to ensure that the HTML+RDFa specification meets all of
the requirements of the HTML WG. Doing this may reduce some of the procedural
load placed on HTML WG and re-focus the group on the core of HTML5.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 05:13:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC