- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:56:24 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8872 --- Comment #6 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-02-15 11:56:23 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I doubt that publishing this as a separate document will "[i]mprove the > discoverability". I suspect that more people will read the HTML5 specification > and derived documents (tutorials etc.) than a document which is devoted to a > very small part of HTML (and not really an interesting part). > That said, without reviewing your document closely, I think it might be an > improvement to HTML5 if section 4.8.3.1 (Requirements for providing text to act > as an alternative for images) were to be replaced by your (finished) document. Hi Ms2gr > I doubt that publishing this as a separate document will "[i]mprove the > discoverability". I suspect that more people will read the HTML5 specification > and derived documents (tutorials etc.) than a document which is devoted to a > very small part of HTML (and not really an interesting part). That is debatable, and it will be a HTML5 derived document, along with the othere associated documents. > I think it might be an > improvement to HTML5 if section 4.8.3.1 (Requirements for providing text to >act as an alternative for images) were to be replaced by your (finished) >document. That could be a consideration if it were possible to include content in the HTML5 spec not authored by the current editor. regards steve -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 11:56:25 UTC