- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:27:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8872 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faulkner.steve@gmail.com Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-02-14 10:27:06 --- Hi Ian, sorry that you don't understand, have you read the change proposal? Would love your feedback on the that. change proposal URL http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/ImgElement20091209 I and other appear to think it is quite clear what I have proposed. The alternative (in progress) draft document is and has been available for your persual for some time now http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/misc/HTML5/new/img-new.html >One need only look as far as HTML4, which did exactly that, to see the >results of hiding accessibility tutorials in other documents. We need this to >be as "in your face" as possible. I am not suggesting hiding anything, te exact opposite actually. I am promoting the importance of the issue by giving it its own HTML WG doecument, rather than burying it in 800 pages of browser specification. But you or anyone else who feels strongly enough can argue that via a change proposal. regards stevef -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 10:27:09 UTC