- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:16:51 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8800 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |NEEDSINFO --- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-02-14 10:16:50 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Did Not Understand Request Change Description: no spec change Rationale: When I studied the APIs, I found them to be very complicated and over-engineered, as much as the drag-and-drop events. I'm not yet convinced that speccing the dnd events as we did is proving to be a good thing. I propose that we wait to see what happens with those before doing the same with the copy/paste events. Would that be acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 10:16:52 UTC