- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:20:17 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8833 Dean Edridge <dean@dean.org.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NEEDSINFO --- Comment #3 from Dean Edridge <dean@dean.org.nz> 2010-02-14 08:20:17 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The HTML WG has formally decided to publish this specification under the name > "HTML5". See <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/results#xname>. > Why are you telling me this? It is irrelevant, I am well aware of that survey, I voted against the "HTML5" title and if others knew that the spec wasn't "HTML5" they would have too. Just because there has been a survey does not mean that the problem is solved, quite the opposite. The survey question was: "Shall the W3C's next-generation HTML specification be named "HTML 5"?" The specification never has been the next-generation HTML specification, HTML5 is just a small part of it. Also, survey results are not binding. Several people including Sam Ruby, Roy Fielding and myself have tried to get the title changed, however, each time we have been ignored (sometimes mocked or laughed at by certain people) and the proposals have been blocked by representatives of browser vendors and the WHATWG. I have explained in detail why the problem needs to be resolved. No technical report should contain two technologies with the same name, and especially when that name is also being used for the name of the spec. It would be irresponsible for the HTML WG to continue to publish this spec when they know of these errors. The title needs to be changed, and at the same time solve the problem with two HTML5s within the spec, and this needs to be done within the group, not by Ian himself. It's a not a hard thing to do, wouldn't take long, just need the HTML WG to accept there's a problem and to make sure people don't interfere and block the change, as unfortunately, this has happened in the past, this is why we still have a spec with errors and contradictions. Due to a conflict of interest, and/or interference in the past, the following people will need to step aside and let the rest of the HTML WG resolve this issue. Ian Hickson, Google, Inc. Maciej Stachowiak, Apple, Inc. David Hyatt, Apple, Inc. I filed a bug report for this issue due to the fact that I've been ignored in the past. I've left the bug as "needsinfo" (not sure what else to use). I'd be happy to discuss this issue later in the week on public-html once my HTML WG membership is renewed. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 08:20:19 UTC