[Bug 8980] New: HTML+RDFa has should-/may-level requirements for undefined constructs

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8980

           Summary: HTML+RDFa has should-/may-level requirements for
                    undefined constructs
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
               URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/#document-conformance
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny)
        AssignedTo: msporny@digitalbazaar.com
        ReportedBy: mjs@apple.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org,
                    msporny@digitalbazaar.com


In Section 3.1 Document Conformance, HTML+RDFa says:

2. There should be a version attribute on the html element. The value of the
version attribute should be "HTML+RDFa 1.0" if the document is a non-XML mode
document, or "XHTML+RDFa 1.0" if the document is a XML mode document.

3. There may be a link element contained in the head element that contains
profile for the the rel attribute and http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab for
the href attribute.

Neither @version nor rel=profile are defined by this document, or by HTML5, and
there is no normative reference cited which defines them as extensions to
HTML5.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 06:41:21 UTC