- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:21:49 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8845
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-02-14 05:21:49 ---
RFC1345 has the distinct advantage of actually saying what ASCII is and how it
maps to Unicode in a file that is immediately accessible via a Web search for
the term "RFC 1345" or by following the link in the references. Searching for
"ANSI.X3-4.1986" gives you basically nothing useful (a Wikipedia page on ASCII,
at best).
Also, please don't file bugs on such trivial and unimportant matters.
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: RFC1345 is a more useful reference for all practical purposes.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 05:21:51 UTC