- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:55:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8606 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |NEEDSINFO --- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-02-14 02:55:29 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Did Not Understand Request Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I am completely at a loss as to what comment 2 is trying to say. The concept of ambiguous ampersands is used to restrict what values "text" can have. Its purpose is to make it non-conforming to have an ampersand followed by something that would, when parsed, be confused for a character reference. As such, the only characters that are allowed after & are space characters, "<" characters, and other "&" characters. All other characters, including all the characters that would form a character reference, are not allowed, and thus a & followed by any such character (e.g. "a" or "#") is am ambiguous ampersand. If we were to _exclude_ characters that formed character references, then this would completely fail to achieve the stated goal. If "&" followed by "gt;" was _not_ an ambiguous ampersand, then there'd be no way to distinguish the text consisting of the four characters "&", "g", "t", ";" from a single character reference ">", and yet both would be legal. This is why ambiguous ampersands are defined as they are. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 02:55:31 UTC