W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 8590] can empty string be a valid keyword?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:46:56 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NgUVc-0003BF-Hg@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8590


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-02-14 02:46:55 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> An empty string is a valid value, but it is not a keyword per se.

That depends on how you define keyword. I don't see why the empty string can't
be defined as a keyword.


> Suggested change:
> 
> "Note:  The empty string can be a valid value when no keyword is explicitly
> defined."

That wouldn't be enough  you'd have to go through the entire spec changing
"keyword" to "value", which would make the whole spec much less readable since
the word "value" is used all over the place. In particular, it would be very
confusing because attributes have values whether they're valid values or not,
so we'd have to define some strings as being valid values and have sentences
talking about whether a value is a valid value that maps to a state or not, and
so on. I tried making this edit but had to abandon it because it really hurt
readability.

In practice I really don't buy that this is a particularly big problem: there
are only two attributes (contenteditable and spellcheck) that take the empty
string as a keyword; together with the note in question, that means only three
places in the whole spec mention this.

EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: While it might be unusual for the empty string to be considered a
keyword, it really is preferable to the alternative.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 02:46:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC