W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 8793] registration procedure for@rel values

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:29:02 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NgGBK-0004j7-98@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8793


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |REMIND




--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-02-13 11:29:02 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Partially Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: Let's revisit this once the issue regarding the new registry has
been resolved. (I don't want to spend lots of time inventing a process only to
have that process be redundant.)

In general I don't know that I agree that the process should be in the spec, or
even that there should be that much of an explicit process  it's the kind of
thing that I feel a should evolve around a community, and need not be
especially formal. However, I agree that even if that is the decision, the spec
should be clear that that is the case and should certainly not give half a
process and let the community contradict it, or anything like that, so this
will definitely need revisiting once we know how the wider issue has been
resolved.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 13 February 2010 11:29:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC