W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 8784] politics in <param> example

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:00:34 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NgFjm-0001fo-Ud@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8784


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-02-13 11:00:34 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: As far as I can tell the fallback text is a completely accurate and
appropriate statement. It might not be what most authors would actually want to
put on their site, but it is nonetheless what every author is really saying
when they don't provide a useful fallback.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 13 February 2010 11:00:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC