- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:28:27 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8735 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |REMIND --- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-02-13 02:28:26 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I'm punting on this for now not because I disagree with the proposal, but because I'd like to see what happens with the rel registry before adding more rel values. It might be that the best way forward is to move all the values with no UA conformance criteria out of the spec and into the registry, rather than having this weird class structure where some types are honoured by being in the spec and others are ghettoised by being in the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 13 February 2010 02:28:29 UTC