W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 8730] Buffering should not be a boolean "autobuffer" tag - but something along the lines of "buffermax= n%" There should also be a "no-cache" attribute - this will overcome expected objections from copyright holders

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:51:45 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Nfuzp-0006Wh-J0@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8730


Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-02-12 12:51:45 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: Regarding the second part, you can already specify the caching
behaviour using HTTP Cache-Control headers, so it doesn't seem that there's
anything needed in HTML itself.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 12:51:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC