W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 7744] Is sniffing required?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:16:15 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Nerp1-0004pS-7k@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7744





--- Comment #24 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  2010-02-09 15:16:14 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> I disagree strongly with your last paragraph. Updating references is a pain.
> And most often the changes do not affect your specification at all. The
> cost-benefit ratio is not good.

I don't believe it's avoidable when you have specific, normative references
(which is the case here).


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:16:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:11 UTC