W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2010

[Bug 7386] SharedWorkerGlobalScope

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:42:36 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Ndi7Y-0002dq-K4@wiggum.w3.org>

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #10 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2010-02-06 10:42:36 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

Status: Rejected
Change Description: actually ended up adding a reference

I tried to do this, but I really couldn't find a way to do it that:

(a) didn't introduce tautologies (like "A cache host is an object that hosts a
cache" or something equally inane).

(b) didn't say anything technically wrong (like the proposed "A cache host is
the object that maintains an association to an ApplicationCache"  it's no the
case that all the objects that maintain an association to an ApplicationCache
are cache hosts).

(c) didn't make the text make no sense in complete.html (e.g. talking about
"other specifications" to mean another section in complete.html).

(d) didn't introduce gratuitous differences between WHATWG and W3C versions.

Web Workers and HTML5 really are just one spec, they're just split for W3C
process reasons. This becomes very visible when trying to make the relationship
one-way only like this.

While doing all this I found another place that referenced Web Workers from
HTML5, so I added another reference.

If anyone has any suggestion for how to do this, please feel free to suggest
what the text should be. I do see the argument that suggests that all the
worker-related appcache stuff should be in the workers section and the appcache
section should only talk about Documents, but I just can't really make it work
that well in practice.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 6 February 2010 10:42:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:10 UTC