- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:03:51 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8331
Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rubys@intertwingly.net
--- Comment #7 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2010-02-03 22:03:51 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Two separate Canvas API specifications have now been created, seemingly
> separate from each other.
>
> Though the Canvas 2D API has been split out of the HTML5 specification, which
> separate document to pursue, and by which editor or group of editors, was not
> resolved.
>
> I tried to initiate a tracker issue to ensure that this was handled
> sufficiently, but was told I was out of order. However, I do believe that the
> procedures in the HTML WG do allow for the re-opening of a bug, if a member of
> the group feels the bug was not satisfactorily resolved.
>
> Either editors from both documents agree to work on the same document, and both
> are listed as editors, or we need to resolve who is the better editor, who has
> the time to edit the document properly.
Ideally bug reports would identify a specific, correctable, technical
deficiency that could be addressed. I don't see that here.
At a minimum, I don't believe that anybody should be listed as an editor
without their concurrence.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 22:03:53 UTC