W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2010

[Bug 10081] Okay, so could you add a note explaining what kind of active Document is *not* "fully active"? After reading very carefully for a few minutes and pondering a bit, I *think* it would be a Document that is the active Document of its browsing context, but w

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:39:14 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OpkuY-0004Ni-GI@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10081


Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED




--- Comment #2 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com>  2010-08-29 16:39:14 ---
I found the recursive definition confusing, mainly since I found the definition
of "the Document through which that browsing context is nested" confusing.  But
I guess it's clear if you read carefully enough, so if you don't think it needs
clarification, I'm not going to insist.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2010 16:39:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:22 UTC