W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2010

[Bug 10068] Suggest making noscript obsolete but conforming

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:55:20 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OoYEy-0003OP-3M@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068





--- Comment #69 from Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>  2010-08-26 08:55:15 ---
(In reply to comment #68)
> I tried to describe an analytics use case for "noscript" in comment #43: record
> the maximum information available about a user or user interaction with a
> single HTTP request (trading the loss of information for a small proportion of
> users for performance and cost gains).
> 
> Nobody has given grounds for dismissing that use case, requested specific
> additional information, suggested any "better approach", or conceded that
> "noscript" is arguably appropriate for that use case. Would anyone who favours
> moving "noscript" along the obsolescence track care to comment one way or the
> other?

I can't think of a way of doing that with a single HTTP request, but I don't
think it's unreasonable to always have the tracking image present to track
basic information and use the script for more detailed information.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 08:55:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:21 UTC