- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:55:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068 --- Comment #69 from Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com> 2010-08-26 08:55:15 --- (In reply to comment #68) > I tried to describe an analytics use case for "noscript" in comment #43: record > the maximum information available about a user or user interaction with a > single HTTP request (trading the loss of information for a small proportion of > users for performance and cost gains). > > Nobody has given grounds for dismissing that use case, requested specific > additional information, suggested any "better approach", or conceded that > "noscript" is arguably appropriate for that use case. Would anyone who favours > moving "noscript" along the obsolescence track care to comment one way or the > other? I can't think of a way of doing that with a single HTTP request, but I don't think it's unreasonable to always have the tracking image present to track basic information and use the script for more detailed information. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 08:55:21 UTC