W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2010

[Bug 10068] Suggest making noscript obsolete but conforming

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:05:18 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OnD2s-0002bz-Hh@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #36 from Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>  2010-08-22 16:05:17 ---
> Fine. Note, though, if you want to include me in the discussion, you should
> send the email to public-html-comments, too. I cannot participate in the HTML
> WG email list.

Ok, I'll just write it here.  Issue-117 is ill-informed.  <noscript> is
both quite popular and quite useful.  It can do things that no other element
can do, which is why folks use it a lot.  In particular, developers can use
<noscript> to defend against threats that (as far as I can tell) cannot be
defended against with other mechanisms.  Finally, this business of firewalls
striping JavaScript is BS, as far as I can tell.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 16:05:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:21 UTC