- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:05:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068 --- Comment #36 from Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> 2010-08-22 16:05:17 --- > Fine. Note, though, if you want to include me in the discussion, you should > send the email to public-html-comments, too. I cannot participate in the HTML > WG email list. Ok, I'll just write it here. Issue-117 is ill-informed. <noscript> is both quite popular and quite useful. It can do things that no other element can do, which is why folks use it a lot. In particular, developers can use <noscript> to defend against threats that (as far as I can tell) cannot be defended against with other mechanisms. Finally, this business of firewalls striping JavaScript is BS, as far as I can tell. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 16:05:19 UTC