W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2010

[Bug 10411] New: Why are all the RFCs referenced in .txt versions? The HTML versions are more convenient (and it's silly for HTML to avoid the HTML versions!).

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:36:50 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10411-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10411

           Summary: Why are all the RFCs referenced in .txt versions?  The
                    HTML versions are more convenient (and it's silly for
                    HTML to avoid the HTML versions!).
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#ref
                    sRFC1345
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#refsRFC1345

Comment:
Why are all the RFCs referenced in .txt versions?  The HTML versions are more
convenient (and it's silly for HTML to avoid the HTML versions!).

Posted from: 68.175.61.233

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 17:36:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:21 UTC