- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:27:10 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9517
Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |NEEDSINFO
--- Comment #4 from Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com> 2010-08-19 09:27:10 ---
Nothing is holding you from adding an alternative option in addition to the
script tag.
Introducing such alternative would give a decision to developers to use the
homogenized version after all. No one would be forced to use *any* of both
alternatives, BUT perhaps in the end, the homogenized version will become a
standard.
Don't forget that you have deprecated the "language" attribute of the <script>
element in favour of the "type" attribute. You wouldn't have had to do this,
either. It has been done for the same reason I mentioned. I don't see why the
other option was more important than the one I have suggested.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2010 09:27:12 UTC