- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:43:06 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10068
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #30 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-08-17 18:43:06 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: <noscript> is used a lot, and used for its purpose. longdesc="" is
used rarely, and used badly when used at all. That's the difference between
those two.
<noscript> is used for all kinds of things, such as showing links that would be
made dynamic by script, or showing a warning that script is required, or all
kinds of other things. Just look around the Web, it's used a lot.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 18:43:07 UTC