W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > August 2010

[Bug 10068] Suggest making noscript obsolete but conforming

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:28:34 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OlITC-0001UW-DH@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #29 from Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>  2010-08-17 09:28:32 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> The two examples where noscript could be used, provided earlier, does
> not account for the fact that [not?] all instances of no script being supported
> actually signal noscript to work. Depending on noscript means, then, that the
> fallback functionality is not available. 

I was asserting that noscript is useful when there is no fallback
functionality.  There's no point in using progressive enhancement if there's no
functionality to gracefully degrade to.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 09:28:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:21 UTC