- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:27:53 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10283 Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2010-08-16 23:27:47 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: I couldn't come up with wording that wasn't more confusing than what > is there now. The spec right now is pretty clear. It seems unlikely that anyone > sane would go so far into the spec and then just read the green bit and not > anything else (including the sentence immediately before it, which gives the > note's context). I have provided a text for you - you don't need to come up with anything. The key point, if you want to formulate something yourself, is to _repeat_. State, _also_ in the green text, that you talk about meta element with UTF-8 as value. When it comes to "that anyone sane would go so far into the spec": the point is that this is the World Wid Web. People search and find small bits of info her and there. One need not have read the sentence before. I cited evidence/observation from the mailinglist. The green text is also the one which justifies why the rule is as it is - and it seems to me that "UTF-8" is the key part of that justification. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 23:27:54 UTC