[Bug 10346] Should define 'class' better


--- Comment #2 from Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>  2010-08-11 15:50:17 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> For example: "may be used for labelling, styling or indicating meaning".
> c/f use of class in microformats

See also issues described in

Perhaps the word "semantic" should be used? I've started a wiki page at 


Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 15:50:20 UTC