- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:12:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9575 --- Comment #1 from Oli Studholme <w3.org@boblet.net> 2010-04-22 05:13:14 --- The footer element begins “The footer element represents a footer for its nearest ancestor sectioning content or sectioning root element”. The header element doesn’t mention this. Either both elements should refer to it or neither should. As this ties into the somewhat complex subjects of sectioning and outlines, it may be better to remove the text and add a new field to the elements’ metadata. Something like “Scope: nearest ancestor sectioning element, or entire page”? Alternatively this text could be added at the end of the description as text or as a note. While header/footer scope should be obvious inside sectioning elements, I think that it applying to the entire page won’t be. It’s association with section/article may lead some authors to assume if they want to use header they need a containing section/article too. HTH -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 05:13:17 UTC