W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > April 2010

[Bug 7543] Consensus on ietf-http-wg was that repetition of relations is meaningless and we should rather use numbering (e.g. "up2"), names (e.g. "great-grandparent") or an attribute (e.g. level="3").

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:13:12 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1O3nya-0008GX-9H@jessica.w3.org>

Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
           Keywords|NE, NoReply                 |
             Status|VERIFIED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|NEEDSINFO                   |

--- Comment #3 from Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>  2010-04-19 10:13:23 ---
My preference is for an attribute, as this is backwards compatible with agents
looking for "up" while still allowing more capable software to know "how far
up". If you only have one level you can only advertise one level, but if you
extend this to an arbitrary number of levels then you can advertise the whole
hierarchy which is useful for features like breadcrumbs.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 10:13:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:16 UTC